The Great
Pet Food Marketing Trap
If
you have just bought a bag of pet food because the bag or label
shouted out at you that this food contained added spirulina, glucosamine,
chondroitin ,Omega-3 and Omega-6, prebiotics, probiotics, Cranberry
Powder, Dried Kelp, Dried Bacillus Licheniformis Fermentation Extract,
Dried Bacillus Subtilis Fermentation Extract, CPA Complex™,
Mannan-oligo-saccharides, Green Tea, selenium yeast, eye of toad
and tongue of newt (I made the last two up!) or anything else that
doesn't sound like 'food' then you need to read on, because you
are in danger of falling into the
GREAT MARKETING TRAP.
What do I mean?
Well,
firstly lets look at the arguement purely from a human perspective,
and here I would urge you to get hold of (or get your library to
stock) a copy of 'In
Defence of Food: The Myth of Nutrition and the Pleasures of Eating
by Michael Pollan, a respected US author and journalist
In the book, Pollan argues strongly for a more sensible approach
to nutrition than that being imposed upon us by government, nutritionists
and the food industry. Why? Pollan says 'Because most of what we're
consuming today is not food, and how we're consuming it -- in the
car, in front of the TV, and increasingly alone -- is not really
eating. Instead of food, we're consuming "edible foodlike substances"
-- no longer the products of nature but of food science. Many of
them come packaged with health claims that should be our first clue
they are anything but healthy. In the so-called Western diet, food
has been replaced by nutrients, and common sense by confusion.'
The result is what Michael Pollan calls the American paradox: The
more we worry about nutrition, the less healthy we seem to become.
But if real food -- the sort of food our great grandmothers would
recognize as food -- stands in need of defense, from whom does it
need defending? From the food industry on one side and nutritional
science on the other. Both stand to gain much from widespread confusion
about what to eat, a question that for most of human history people
have been able to answer without expert help. Yet the professionalization
of eating has failed to make Americans healthier. Thirty years of
official nutritional advice has only made us sicker and fatter while
ruining countless numbers of meals.
Take one example: Margarine
In 1869 Emperor Louis Napoleon III of France offered a prize
to anyone who could make a satisfactory substitute for butter,
suitable for use by the armed forces and the lower classes.
French chemist (yes, chemist!) Hippolyte Mège-Mouriés
invented a substance he called oleomargarine, the name of
which became shortened to the trade name "Margarine".
Margarine now refers generically to any of a range of broadly
similar edible oils. The name oleomargarine is sometimes abbrieviated
to oleo.
Manufacturers
produced oleomargarine by taking clarified vegetable fat,
extracting the liquid portion under pressure, and then allowing
it to solidify. When combined with butyrin and water, it made
a cheap and more-or-less palatable butter-substitute. Modern
margarine can be made from any of a wide variety of animal
or vegetable fats, and is often mixed with skimmed milk, salt,
and emulsifiers.
In some European countries butter based table spreads and
margarine products are marketed as "butter mixtures".
These "butter mixtures" compose a significant portion
of the table spread market. The brand "I Can't Believe
It's Not Butter" spawned a variety of similarly-named
spreads that can be found on supermarket shelves all over
the world. With names like "Utterly Butterly," "You'd
Butter Believe it," and "Butterlicious," these
butter mixtures avoid the restrictions on labeling with marketing
techniques that imply a strong similarity to real butter.
BUT
let's take a step back. Margarine (a highly processed product)
was promoted just a few years ago as the truly healthy alternative
to butter, a natural product which in excess is not so good
for us. Now we discover that margarine, full of hydrogenated
fatty acids and trans fat is really BAD for us, we've actually
been damaging our health following the nutritionists advice
and manufacturers have had to scurry around finding alternatives
in the light of current scientific thinking.
I'm sorry, but there is a natural alternative to
this unhealthy margarine. Your mother and grandmother knew
all about it, it's called butter and to make it healthier
you just eat less of it! |
Pollan proposes a new (and very old) answer to the question of
what we should eat that comes down to seven simple but liberating
words: Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants. By urging us to once
again eat food, he challenges the prevailing nutrient-by-nutrient
approach -- what he calls nutritionism -- and proposes an alternative
way of eating that is informed by the traditions and ecology of
real, well-grown, unprocessed food.
Our personal health, he argues, cannot be divorced from the health
of the food chains of which we are part. We can escape the Western
diet and, by doing so, most of the chronic diseases that diet causes.
We can relearn which foods are healthy, develop simple ways to moderate
our appetites, and return eating to its proper context -- out of
the car and back to the table. Michael Pollan's bracing and eloquent
manifesto shows us how we can start making thoughtful food choices
that will enrich our lives, enlarge our sense of what it means to
be healthy, and bring pleasure back to eating.
And so to pet food
OK, now let's look at what's been happening on the pet scene in
the last few years. Quite honestly, what the pet food industry has
been doing is mirroring the human food industry. As health food
magazines promote the latest nutrichemical fad and foods become
low fat, low salt, low fibre, low taste and low everything else,
what has increased has been the ingredient label, as whole foods
have been replaced by nutrichemicals. Look at current pet food labels.
As an example, and just an example (I'm not saying this is wrong,
just typical of this whole marketing thing) look at the ingredients
in a bag of Nutro Holistic Food (Holistic, in my definition means
'natural')
Dried Chicken Meat, Whole Brown Rice, Ground
Rice, Dried Lamb Meat, Sunflower Oil (min. 4.5%), Poultry
Fat (min. 4%), Dried Salmon Meat, Flaxseed, Oatmeal, Dried
Alfalfa, Dried Beet Pulp, Dried Tomato, Cranberry Powder,
Menhaden Fish Oil (min. 0.5%), Potassium Chloride, Dried
Kelp,
|
Dried Tomato? Cranberry Powder? Flaxseed?Dried Bacillus Licheniformis
fermentation Extract? Dried Bacillus Subtilis Fermentation Extract?
These are not traditional pet food ingredients. The question has
to be asked... Are they actually necessary if the food is good enough
quality to offer complete nutrition without them?
Royal Canin now have a bewildering range of foods for lifestages
and breeds, indoor and outdoor cats as well as a range of foods
for health problems. Are these necessary or just marketing managers
pandering to our perceived needs - if scientists tell me I need
Omega 3 in my diet I must feed the cat some as well?! What about
the cat I grew up with as a child who lived to a ripe old age with
no particular health problems. That was achieved on a simple food
without all this added chemistry set! What about my Father-in-law's
farm dogs, brought up on table scraps, washings out from the dairy
and a handfull of fish meal - they worked hard, looked fit and never
needed a single visit to the vet.
Breed specific diets? If they are no more expensive than your normal
food then fine, but please ask the question otherwise - Is this
more marketing hype than necessity?
As to lifestage foods, well there is certainly some sense in this,
but maybe not quite as much as some manufacturers would like us
to believe. Puppies need a higher level of some nutrients than adults,
as do very working active dogs, pregnant and lactating bitches,
but not so crucial maybe are the so-called senior recipes. As you
and I get older we adjust our diet by eating less as our level of
activity goes down. The same should be true for our pets - as they
get older they need less to eat so we need to adjust the amount
we feed. This can be done by either reducing quantity or changing
to a lighter diet, lower in protein and fat - there are several
adult light diets that fit the bill.
Let's hear it for a sensible approach to the nutrition of our pets.
Three cheers to companies who refuse to go down the route of adding
novel chemicals and nutrichemicals to their food just for the sake
of it. I want to feed my pets food not chemicals. If the ingredients
are not good enough and complete by themselves then why not get
that right first before supplementing the diet with unnecessary
things.
Remember margarine - it was the healthiest thing since sliced bread,
until all of a sudden it wasn't - who's to say Omega 3 won't be
next!
|
|